Concurrency · interview question
A teammate submits shaky processes for cpu work code. Which review comment is the strongest?
Multiple choiceHardchapter-15-curatedpremiumconcurrencyprocesses-for-cpu-work
Answer and explanation
Correct answer
C. Make the rule clearer and easier to explain. Use processes when the workload is truly CPU-heavy and parallel execution is worth the serialization cost.
Why
The best review comment anchors the change to readability, correctness, and future maintenance. Throwing CPU-heavy work into threads and expecting parallel speedups often disappoints.
Test yourself on Concurrency
A free test with instant, explained results. No account needed.
More Concurrency questions
- What kind of contract clarity matters most for task coordination?
- What production risk should you worry about most if task coordination is handled lazily?
- A senior interviewer asks for one tradeoff behind semaphores, timeouts, and cancellation. What is the strongest…
- Which explanation would sound strongest in an interview when discussing threads for blocking i/o?
- Another engineer will maintain this code later. What choice helps the most around semaphores, timeouts, and…
- What kind of contract clarity matters most for threads for blocking i/o?