Automation Scripts · interview question
A bug appears around input assumptions. What is the strongest first debugging move?
Multiple choiceMediumchapter-1-curatedpremiumautomation-scriptsinput-assumptions
def validate_line(sku: str, quantity: int) -> None:
if not sku:
raise ValueError("sku is required")
if quantity <= 0:
raise ValueError("quantity must be positive")Answer and explanation
Correct answer
A. Trace one concrete example, inspect the state transitions, and compare them to the intended rule before rewriting anything.
Why
That approach is reliable because it creates evidence. If the script quietly accepts malformed input, the later math and formatting steps only hide the original problem.
Test yourself on Automation Scripts
A free test with instant, explained results. No account needed.
More Automation Scripts questions
- If you wrote a test around input assumptions, what should the test prove first?
- You cannot rewrite everything today. What is the best incremental improvement around import/export mini project?
- Which boundary choice best fits input assumptions in a maintainable Python system?
- Which explanation would sound strongest in an interview when discussing import/export mini project?
- If you wrote a test around reporting and auditability, what should the test prove first?
- Which move is the best default when input assumptions becomes part of this workflow?