Skip to content
Sharp

NGN case study

Postoperative Sepsis Risk

A 67-year-old client is 2 days postoperative after bowel resection. Setting: Medical-surgical unit.

Client record

Nurses' Notes

  • 0800: Reports chills and increasing incisional pain.
  • 0830: Incision edges approximated; drainage is cloudy with odor.
  • 0900: Client states, "I feel confused and weak."

Vital Signs

  • 0600: T 37.7 C, HR 94, BP 128/76, RR 18, SpO2 96% RA.
  • 0900: T 38.9 C, HR 118, BP 94/58, RR 24, SpO2 93% RA.

Laboratory Results

  • WBC 18,600/mm3; lactate 3.1 mmol/L.
  • Creatinine increased from 0.9 to 1.4 mg/dL.
  • Urine output 20 mL/hr for the last 2 hours.

Orders

  • Maintain IV lactated Ringer's at 75 mL/hr.
  • Morphine 2 mg IV every 4 hr PRN severe pain.
  • Notify provider for systolic BP below 100 mmHg.

Questions

Question 1 of 6

Recognize cues. Which findings require immediate follow-up? Select all that apply.

Select all that apply
Answer and rationale
  • A. Blood pressure 94/58 mmHg
  • B. Lactate 3.1 mmol/L
  • C. Cloudy, foul-smelling wound drainage
  • D. Incisional pain increasing since morning

The client has signs of infection with possible hypoperfusion. SpO2 of 96% earlier is not the urgent cue.

Low blood pressure, elevated lactate, infected drainage, and worsening pain are concerning cues.

Question 2 of 6

Analyze cues. For each finding, classify whether it supports sepsis, expected postoperative recovery, or needs more data.

Choose for each row.

Choose one option per row
ItemSupports sepsisExpected recoveryNeeds more data
Temperature 38.9 C with chills
WBC 18,600/mm3
Approximated incision edges
New confusion and weakness
Answer and rationale
  • Temperature 38.9 C with chills: Supports sepsis
  • WBC 18,600/mm3: Supports sepsis
  • Approximated incision edges: Expected recovery
  • New confusion and weakness: Supports sepsis

NGN matrix items require sorting cues, not reacting to one value in isolation.

Fever, leukocytosis, and acute mental status change support sepsis; approximated wound edges alone are expected.

Question 3 of 6

Prioritize hypotheses. Complete the bow-tie by selecting the most likely condition, two actions, and two parameters to monitor.

Complete the diagram: 1 condition, the actions to take, and the parameters to monitor.

Actions to take

Action
Action

Condition

Most likely condition

Parameters to monitor

Parameter
Parameter
Actions to take (choose 2) (0/2)
Condition most likely (choose 1) (0/1)
Parameters to monitor (choose 2) (0/2)
Answer and rationale
  • Condition: Sepsis with hypoperfusion
  • Actions to take: Obtain ordered cultures before antibiotics if this does not delay care, Increase IV fluid support as prescribed and prepare for sepsis protocol
  • Parameters to monitor: Urine output, Lactate and blood pressure trend

Bow-tie items test whether the candidate can connect condition, actions, and monitoring rather than pick one isolated answer.

The bow-tie centers on sepsis with hypoperfusion, urgent infection workup/fluid support, and perfusion monitoring.

Question 4 of 6

Take action. Which action should the nurse take first?

Choose one answer
Answer and rationale

A. Notify the provider using current vital signs, lactate, urine output, and wound findings.

The provider notification threshold is met and the client shows possible sepsis with hypoperfusion.

Escalate immediately with objective data.

Question 5 of 6

Evaluate outcomes. After initial treatment, which trend best indicates improvement?

Trend after treatment (earliest → latest):
- Blood pressure: 94/58 → 102/64 → 116/70
- Heart rate: 118 → 104 → 92
- Urine output: 20 mL/hr → 32 mL/hr → 45 mL/hr

Choose one answer
Answer and rationale

A. Improving blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output

For sepsis, improved hemodynamics and urine output are stronger early outcome markers than one isolated symptom.

Improving perfusion markers show response to treatment.

Question 6 of 6

Generate solutions. Complete the nurse's plan of care using the best drop-down choices.

Choose the option that best completes each blank.

Priority problem: . Priority action: . Evaluation finding: .

Answer and rationale

Priority problem: infection with hypoperfusion. Priority action: escalate and prepare for sepsis protocol. Evaluation finding: urine output improves to at least 30 mL/hr.

Drop-down cloze items test a connected clinical sentence: problem, action, and measurable evaluation.

Prioritize infection with hypoperfusion, escalate care, and evaluate perfusion.