Object-oriented programming · interview question
Why should setters in a class be avoided or minimized?
Multiple choiceMediumchapter-3-curatedpremiumoopcontrolled-mutation
Answer and explanation
Correct answer
D. They can lead to uncontrolled changes to the object's state
Why
Setters allow external code to modify an object's state directly, which can lead to inconsistent states and bugs. It's better to provide specific methods that ensure the object remains in a valid state.
Test yourself on Object-oriented programming
A free test with instant, explained results. No account needed.
More Object-oriented programming questions
- Why does declaring a method as 'final' in a superclass change runtime behavior?
- Why might a developer choose to use a 'restock' method rather than a public setter for inventory?
- How do unmodifiable views differ from defensive copies in protecting internal collections?
- In an e-commerce application, what is the advantage of using a 'processOrder' method in a Product class?
- Which statement is true about interfaces in Java?
- Why are public mutable fields risky in a store model?