Concurrency basics · interview question
Why might you choose CompletableFuture over traditional Future in Java?
Multiple choiceMediumchapter-15-curatedpremiumconcurrencycompletablefuture
Answer and explanation
Correct answer
C. CompletableFuture supports non-blocking asynchronous programming.
Why
CompletableFuture supports non-blocking asynchronous programming, allowing you to chain multiple computations and handle exceptions fluently, which is not possible with traditional Future.
Test yourself on Concurrency basics
A free test with instant, explained results. No account needed.
More Concurrency basics questions
- How can you ensure that a CompletableFuture runs on a specific Executor?
- Which situation benefits most from using AtomicInteger over synchronized blocks?
- Which CompletableFuture method should be used to execute a task asynchronously in a non-blocking manner?
- In which scenario would you use.thenCompose() over.thenApply() in CompletableFuture?
- Which CompletableFuture method should be used to handle both results and exceptions in a unified way?
- How does AtomicInteger's getAndIncrement method differ from incrementAndGet?